- WBPaper00053289:DREAM-target
N.A.
Transcripts with promoter regions binding DREAM protein complex, according to ChIP-seq of E2F-DP (DPL-1 and EFL-1) and MuvB (LIN-9, LIN-37, LIN-52, and LIN-54) of N2 late embryo.
- WBPaper00062056:efl-1(se1)_downregulated
A gene model was built based on the WS260 annotation. Tag counts for each gene were extracted from STAR aligned BAM files, anddifferential gene expression between N2 and mutant backgrounds was tested using DESeq2. A false discovery rate(FDR) < 0.01 and LFC > 0.5849 was used to define genes as upregulated, and FDR < 0.01 and LFC < -1 was used to define genes asdownregulated.
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in efl-1(se1) comparing to in N2 animals at starved L1 larva stage.
- WBPaper00062056:efl-1(se1)_upregulated
A gene model was built based on the WS260 annotation. Tag counts for each gene were extracted from STAR aligned BAM files, anddifferential gene expression between N2 and mutant backgrounds was tested using DESeq2. A false discovery rate(FDR) < 0.01 and LFC > 0.5849 was used to define genes as upregulated, and FDR < 0.01 and LFC < -1 was used to define genes asdownregulated.
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in efl-1(se1) comparing to in N2 animals at starved L1 larva stage.
- WBPaper00027758:Group_I
For each set of mutant data, the repeats were averaged, and a Z test [Z=(observedexpected)\/SE] was performed in Excel. A moderate correction for multiple testing (~17,600 genes) was performed by multiplying the calculated P-value by 10,000. After this correction, all genes with up- or downregulation greater than twofold, P<0.05 in any given mutant were selected. The hypergeometric probability test was used to calculate the significance of overlap of gene groups. Authors determined whether transcripts of Group I-IV genes are bound by GLD-1, based on a minimum criteria of >1.5 enrichment in GLD-1 immunoprecipitated samples compared to control immunoprecipitations (P < 0.01).
Genes downregulated in dpl-1(n3316) and efl-1(n3639) mutants.
- WBPaper00027758:Group_II
For each set of mutant data, the repeats were averaged, and a Z test [Z=(observedexpected)\/SE] was performed in Excel. A moderate correction for multiple testing (~17,600 genes) was performed by multiplying the calculated P-value by 10,000. After this correction, all genes with up- or downregulation greater than twofold, P<0.05 in any given mutant were selected. The hypergeometric probability test was used to calculate the significance of overlap of gene groups. Authors determined whether transcripts of Group I-IV genes are bound by GLD-1, based on a minimum criteria of >1.5 enrichment in GLD-1 immunoprecipitated samples compared to control immunoprecipitations (P < 0.01).
Genes with lower expression in efl-1, dpl-1 and lin-35 mutants than in control gonads.
- WBPaper00027758:Regulated_genes_not_in_group
For each set of mutant data, the repeats were averaged, and a Z test [Z=(observedexpected)\/SE] was performed in Excel. A moderate correction for multiple testing (~17,600 genes) was performed by multiplying the calculated P-value by 10,000. After this correction, all genes with up- or downregulation greater than twofold, P<0.05 in any given mutant were selected. The hypergeometric probability test was used to calculate the significance of overlap of gene groups. Authors determined whether transcripts of Group I-IV genes are bound by GLD-1, based on a minimum criteria of >1.5 enrichment in GLD-1 immunoprecipitated samples compared to control immunoprecipitations (P < 0.01).
Genes whose expression is either up- or downregulated in efl-1, dpl-1 or lin-35 mutants relative to controls.
- WBPaper00027758:Group_III
For each set of mutant data, the repeats were averaged, and a Z test [Z=(observedexpected)\/SE] was performed in Excel. A moderate correction for multiple testing (~17,600 genes) was performed by multiplying the calculated P-value by 10,000. After this correction, all genes with up- or downregulation greater than twofold, P<0.05 in any given mutant were selected. The hypergeometric probability test was used to calculate the significance of overlap of gene groups. Authors determined whether transcripts of Group I-IV genes are bound by GLD-1, based on a minimum criteria of >1.5 enrichment in GLD-1 immunoprecipitated samples compared to control immunoprecipitations (P < 0.01).
Genes with higher expression in one or more mutants of efl-1, dpl-1 and lin-35 relative to controls.
- WBPaper00045217:prg-1_progressively_regulated
Genes with more than 2-fold change in expression level are considered differentially expressed.
Genes altered by more than 2-Fold in late versus early generation prg-1 mutants and prg-1; daf-2 mutants. Samples include prg-1(pk2290), prg-1(n4357), prg-1(tm872), prg-1(pk2290); daf-2(e1368), prg-1(pk2290); daf-2(e1370), prg-1(tm872); daf-2(e1370), prg-1(tm872); daf-2(m41).
- WBPaper00059609:malt-1_ilc-17.1_nfki-1_downregulated
Cufflinks (v2.2.1). q < 0.05.
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in malt-1(db1194);npr-1(ad609) animals, in npr-1(ad609) ilc-17.1(tm5218) animals, and in npr-1(ad609) nfki-1(db1198) animals, comparing to the wild type control npr-1(ad609).