-
[
Biochem Cell Biol,
1999]
The Ro ribonucleoprotein complex (Ro RNP) was initially described as an autoimmune target in human diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus and Sjogren's syndrome. In Xenopus and human cells, its general structure is composed of one major protein of 60 kDa, Ro60, that binds to one of four small RNA molecules, designated Y RNAs. Although no function has been assigned to the Ro RNP, Ro60 has been shown to bind mutant 5S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) molecules in Xenopus oocytes, suggesting a role for Ro60 in 5S rRNA biogenesis. Ro60 has also been shown to participate in the regulation of the translational fate of the L4 ribosomal protein mRNA by interacting with the 5' untranslated region, again suggesting its possible implication in ribosome biogenesis. To identify the function of Ro RNP, we have taken a genetic approach in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. As such, we characterized the gene encoding the protein ROP-1, the homologue of the human Ro60 protein. Here, we review the phenotypic analysis of C. elegans rop-l(-) mutants and integrate these results into a model for the function of the Ro RNP particle.
-
[
Adv Genet,
1990]
As recognized by T. H. Morgan, the problems of genetics and development are interwoven. Morgan noted that understanding how the genotype of an organism specifies its phenotype would require knowing the fundamental mechanisms of gene action, how genes interact to specify the properties of cells, and how cells interact to specify each adult character. We now have a basic understanding of the primary effects of genes (to encode protein or RNA products). However, little is known about how the genes of a zygote specify a complex pattern of cell divisions, the generation of diverse cell types, and the arrangement of those cells into specific morphological structures. A "favorable material" (as Morgan put it) for investigating these problems would be a simple organism in which development could be analyzed at the level of single genes and single cells. The small free-living soil nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is such an organism...
-
[
Subcell Biochem,
2008]
This chapter discusses various aspects of coronin phylogeny, structure and function that are of specific interest. Two subfamilies of ancient coronins of unicellular pathogens such as Entamoeba, Trypanosoma, Leishmania and Acanthamoeba as well as of Plasmodium, Babesia, and Trichomonas are presented in the first two sections. Their coronins generally bind to F-actin and apparently are involved in proliferation, locomotion and phagocytosis. However, there are so far no studies addressing a putative role of coronin in the virulence of these pathogens. The following section delineates genetic anomalies like the chimeric coronin-fusion products with pelckstrin homology and gelsolin domains that are found in amoeba. Moreover, most nonvertebrate metazoa appear to encode CRN8, CRN9 and CRN7 representatives (for these coronin symbols see Chapter 2), but in e.g., Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans a CRN9 is missing. The forth section deals with the evolutionary expansion of vertebrate coronins. Experimental data on the F-actin binding CRN2 of Xenopus (Xcoronin) including a Cdc42/Rac interactive binding (CRIB) motif that is also present in other members of the coronin protein family are discussed. Xenopus laevis represents a case for the expansion of the seven vertebrate coronins due to tetraploidization events. Other examples for a change in the number of coronin paralogs are zebrafish and birds, but (coronin) gene duplication events also occurred in unicellular protozoa. The fifth section of this chapter briefly summarizes three different cellular processes in which CRN4/CORO1A is involved, namely actin-binding, superoxide generation and Ca(2+)-signaling and refers to the largely unexplored mammalian coronins CRN5/CORO2A and CRN6/CORO2B, the latter binding to vinculin. The final section discusses how, by unveiling the aspects of coronin function in organisms reported so far, one can trace a remarkable evolution and diversity in their individual roles anticipating a rather complex and intricate involvement of coronins in a variety of cellular processes.
-
[
Annual Review of Genetics,
1984]
As recognized by T. H. Morgan, the problems of genetics and development are interwoven: understanding how the genotype of an organism specifies its phenotype requires knowing the fundamental mechanism of gene action, how genes interact to specify the properties of cells, and how cells interact to specify each adult character. We now know that the primary effect of a gene is to encode a protein or RNA product. However, little is known about how the genes of a zygote specify a complex pattern of cell divisions, the generation of diverse cell types, and the arrangement of those cells into specific morphological structures. A "favorable material" (as Morgan put it) for investigating these problems would be a simple organism in which development could be analyzed at the level of single genes and single cells. The small free-living soil nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is such an organism. C. elegans is easily grown and handled in the laboratory and is well suited for both genetic and developmental studies. This nematode consists of only about 1,000 (non-germ) cells, and both its anatomy and its development are essentially invariant. The complete anatomy of C. elegans, including the "wiring diagram" of the nervous system, is known at an ultrastructural level. In addition, the developmental origin of every cell is known since the complete cell lineage from the zygote to the adult has been determined. The genetic properties of C. elegans allow researchers to combine the classical Mendelian approach of Morgan and his coworkers with the approach of modern microbial genetics: C. elegans is diploid but microscopic in size (so large numbers of animals can be handled, up to 10*5 on a single petri dish) and has a very rapid life cycle (an egg matures into a fertile adult within two to four days, depending upon temperature; this adult produces 300-400 progeny over the next few days, resulting in an effective organismal doubling time of about 15 hours). Many aspects of the biology of C. elegans have been reviewed. Here we describe how these features have led to an initial understanding of some of the issues concerning genetics and development that Morgan raised fifty years ago. We review the methods underlying and the results derived form four approaches that have been used to study the genetics of nematode development. The first approach, which takes advantage of the genetic diversity generated by evolution, is to compare the development of related species. For example, simple differences in otherwise identical cell lineages may be the result of one or a few mutational events that occurred during the divergence of two species; the nature of these differences can suggest ways in which genes may control development. The second approach is to identify a large set of mutations that affect particular cell lineages; this approach can indicate the number, types, and specificities of genes that affect particular developmental events. The third approach involves the detailed genetic analyses of genes identified by mutations that alter development; such studies can reveal the wild-type functions of those genes and thereby identify genes that play regulatory roles in development. The fourth approach is to examine the interactions among mutations using studies of extragenic suppression and epistasis; this type of analysis can suggest how genes interact during normal development to